Screener
CWS vs RGLO
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- RGLO costs 0.16% less per year.
- CWS follows a active selection strategy; RGLO uses index tracking.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWS | RGLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $309M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.31% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.35% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.82% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CWS and RGLO
Explore further