Screener
CWS vs TMFX
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF vs Motley Fool Next Index ETF
Key differences
- TMFX costs 0.15% less per year.
- CWS is significantly larger than TMFX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CWS follows a active selection strategy; TMFX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWS | TMFX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $31M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.31% | 0.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.0% | +13.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.35% | 16.79% |
| Max drawdown | -33.82% | -34.30% |
Similar to CWS and TMFX
Explore further