Screener
CWS vs WABF
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF vs Western Asset Bond ETF
Key differences
CWS is an equity ETF, while WABF is a fixed income ETF. CWS charges 0.65% a year and WABF 0.35%.
- CWS is an equity fund, while WABF is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- WABF costs 0.30% less per year.
- CWS is much larger than WABF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWS | WABF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $16M |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.31% | 4.80% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.9% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 3.71% |
| Max drawdown | -33.82% | -5.36% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.