Screener
CZA vs ZECP
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF
Key differences
- ZECP costs 0.14% less per year.
- CZA follows a index tracking strategy; ZECP uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ZECP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | ZECP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $342M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 10.69% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -21.85% |
Similar to CZA and ZECP
Explore further