Screener
DBND vs CGSD
DoubleLine Opportunistic Core Bond ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSD costs 0.20% less per year.
- CGSD is significantly larger than DBND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBND | CGSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $720M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.78% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.33% | 1.46% |
| Max drawdown | -9.19% | -1.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DBND and CGSD
Explore further