Screener
DBND vs LCR
DoubleLine Opportunistic Core Bond ETF vs Leuthold Core ETF
Key differences
- DBND costs 0.39% less per year.
- DBND is significantly larger than LCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DBND is classified as fixed income, while LCR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, LCR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBND | LCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $720M | $70M |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.78% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +14.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.33% | 7.52% |
| Max drawdown | -9.19% | -17.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DBND and LCR
Explore further