Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

DCOR vs DFUV

Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF vs Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF

DCOR

Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.14%

Fund size

$3.0B

DFUV

Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.21%

Fund size

$14.4B

Key differences

  • DCOR costs 0.07% less per year.
  • DFUV is significantly larger than DCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DCOR is classified as alternative, while DFUV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • DCOR follows a multi strategy strategy; DFUV uses active selection.
  • DFUV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

DCORDFUV
Annual cost (TER)0.14%0.21%
Fund size (AUM)$3.0B$14.4B
Since20231998
Dividend yield0.95%1.41%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategymulti strategyactive selection
CAGR 1Y+29.0%+33.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+19.3%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.05
Volatility 1Y11.99%11.87%
Max drawdown-19.10%-17.60%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to DCOR and DFUV