Screener
DDM vs DOG
ProShares Ultra Dow30 vs ProShares Short Dow30
Key differences
- DDM is significantly larger than DOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DDM follows a leveraged strategy; DOG uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, DDM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DDM | DOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $530M | $111M |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.95% | 3.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.1% | -14.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.6% | -8.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | -5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | -0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.36% | 12.18% |
| Max drawdown | -63.13% | -70.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DDM and DOG
Explore further