Screener
DECO vs IGF
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
DECO is an alternative ETF, while IGF is an equity ETF. DECO charges 0.65% a year and IGF 0.39%.
- DECO is an alternative fund, while IGF is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- DECO follows a structured outcome strategy; IGF uses index tracking.
- IGF costs 0.26% less per year.
- IGF is much larger than DECO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DECO | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23M | $10.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.67% | 2.97% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 45.00% | 10.52% |
| Max drawdown | -47.71% | -42.11% |
Similar to DECO and IGF
Explore further