Screener
DEEF vs FSMD
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF vs Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FSMD costs 0.09% less per year.
- FSMD is significantly larger than DEEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DEEF covers global markets; FSMD covers north america.
- DEEF follows a index enhanced strategy; FSMD uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| DEEF | FSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2015 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.39% | 1.25% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.7% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.59% | 15.36% |
| Max drawdown | -36.47% | -40.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DEEF and FSMD
Explore further