Screener
DFAS vs CGVV
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF
Key differences
- DFAS costs 0.07% less per year.
- DFAS is significantly larger than CGVV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFAS follows a active selection strategy; CGVV uses index tracking.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAS | CGVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.0B | $128M |
| Since | 1998 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.89% | — |
| Max drawdown | -26.13% | -10.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAS and CGVV
Explore further