Screener
DFAS vs NULC
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF vs Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
Key differences
- NULC costs 0.05% less per year.
- DFAS is significantly larger than NULC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFAS follows a active selection strategy; NULC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, NULC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAS | NULC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.0B | $57M |
| Since | 1998 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +25.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.89% | 12.88% |
| Max drawdown | -26.13% | -34.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAS and NULC
Explore further