Screener
DFAS vs PSC
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF vs Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- DFAS costs 0.12% less per year.
- DFAS is significantly larger than PSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFAS follows a active selection strategy; PSC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAS | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.0B | $2.0B |
| Since | 1998 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.89% | 18.83% |
| Max drawdown | -26.13% | -46.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAS and PSC
Explore further