Screener
DFAT vs DFUV
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF vs Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
Key differences
- DFUV costs 0.07% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, DFUV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAT | DFUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.7B | $14.4B |
| Since | 1998 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.8% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.98% | 11.87% |
| Max drawdown | -26.12% | -17.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAT and DFUV
Explore further