Screener
DFAW vs AAVM
Dimensional World Equity ETF vs Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
Key differences
- DFAW costs 0.14% less per year.
- DFAW is significantly larger than AAVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFAW follows a index tracking strategy; AAVM uses active selection.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAW | AAVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $24M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.8% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.13% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -16.94% | -34.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAW and AAVM
Explore further