Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

DFAW vs ENHI

Dimensional World Equity ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF

DFAW

Dimensional World Equity ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.24%

Fund size

$1.3B

ENHI

iShares Enhanced International Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.27%

Fund size

$11M

Key differences

  • DFAW is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DFAW is classified as equity, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • DFAW follows a index tracking strategy; ENHI uses active selection.

Side-by-side comparison

DFAWENHI
Annual cost (TER)0.24%0.27%
Fund size (AUM)$1.3B$11M
Since20232026
Dividend yield1.31%
Asset classequityalternative
Region
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+30.8%N/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y12.13%
Max drawdown-16.94%-5.65%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to DFAW and ENHI