Screener
DFCF vs GIGB
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.09% less per year.
- DFCF is significantly larger than GIGB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFCF follows a active selection strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFCF | GIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.17% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.1B | $907M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.43% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.04% | 4.40% |
| Max drawdown | -19.56% | -22.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFCF and GIGB
Explore further