Screener
DFIC vs BDYN
Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- DFIC costs 0.18% less per year.
- DFIC is significantly larger than BDYN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFIC is classified as equity, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- BDYN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFIC | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.6B | $2.7B |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.31% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.88% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.40% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFIC and BDYN
Explore further