Screener
DFIC vs KAT
Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- DFIC costs 0.53% less per year.
- DFIC is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFIC | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.6B | $688M |
| Since | 2022 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.31% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.88% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.40% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFIC and KAT
Explore further