Screener
DFII vs YBTC
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF vs Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
Key differences
- DFII costs 0.10% less per year.
- YBTC is significantly larger than DFII — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFII | YBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $158M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 25.35% | 78.98% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -29.1% | -25.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.89% | 38.71% |
| Max drawdown | -48.07% | -47.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFII and YBTC
Explore further