Screener
DFIV vs FVAL
Dimensional International Value ETF vs Fidelity Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 0.12% less per year.
- DFIV is significantly larger than FVAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFIV covers global ex us markets; FVAL covers north america.
- DFIV follows a active selection strategy; FVAL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, DFIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFIV | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19.3B | $1.2B |
| Since | 1999 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.9% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.5% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | 11.74% |
| Max drawdown | -25.42% | -37.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFIV and FVAL
Explore further