Screener
DFSV vs CGVV
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF
Key differences
- DFSV is significantly larger than CGVV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFSV follows a active selection strategy; CGVV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFSV | CGVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.5B | $128M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.83% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.02% | -10.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFSV and CGVV
Explore further