Screener
DFTT vs CGBL
DF Tactical 30 ETF vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
DFTT is an alternative ETF, while CGBL is a mixed asset ETF. DFTT charges 0.01% a year and CGBL 0.33%.
- DFTT is an alternative fund, while CGBL is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- DFTT follows a tactical allocation strategy; CGBL uses active selection.
- DFTT costs 0.32% less per year.
- CGBL is much larger than DFTT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFTT | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.01% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $6.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -10.46% | -11.66% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.