Screener
DFUV vs DCOR
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF
Key differences
- DCOR costs 0.07% less per year.
- DFUV is significantly larger than DCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFUV is classified as equity, while DCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- DFUV follows a active selection strategy; DCOR uses multi strategy.
- DFUV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFUV | DCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.21% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.4B | $3.0B |
| Since | 1998 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.87% | 11.99% |
| Max drawdown | -17.60% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFUV and DCOR
Explore further