Screener
DFUV vs MFSV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF vs MFS Active Value ETF
Key differences
- DFUV costs 0.23% less per year.
- DFUV is significantly larger than MFSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFUV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFUV | MFSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.21% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.4B | $443M |
| Since | 1998 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.87% | 10.34% |
| Max drawdown | -17.60% | -12.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFUV and MFSV
Explore further