Screener
DGRE vs XCNY
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.13% less per year.
- DGRE is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DGRE follows a active selection strategy; XCNY uses index tracking.
- DGRE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DGRE | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $137M | $9M |
| Since | 2013 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.7% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.74% | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -36.95% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DGRE and XCNY
Explore further