Screener
DGRO vs CGDV
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF vs Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.25% less per year.
- DGRO follows a index tracking strategy; CGDV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DGRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DGRO | CGDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39.6B | $33.0B |
| Since | 2014 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.00% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +25.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.59% | 11.75% |
| Max drawdown | -35.10% | -21.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DGRO and CGDV
Explore further