Screener
DGRO vs PFM
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF vs Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.44% less per year.
- DGRO is significantly larger than PFM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DGRO | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39.6B | $764M |
| Since | 2014 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.00% | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.6% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.59% | 9.63% |
| Max drawdown | -35.10% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DGRO and PFM
Explore further