Screener
DGRO vs SMDV
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF vs ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.32% less per year.
- DGRO is significantly larger than SMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DGRO | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39.6B | $661M |
| Since | 2014 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.00% | 2.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.6% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.44 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.59% | 15.90% |
| Max drawdown | -35.10% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DGRO and SMDV
Explore further