Screener
DGS vs EMCB
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
Key differences
- DGS is significantly larger than EMCB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DGS is classified as equity, while EMCB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- DGS follows a index tracking strategy; EMCB uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DGS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DGS | EMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $100M |
| Since | 2007 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.31% | 5.37% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.62 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.41% | 4.47% |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -22.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DGS and EMCB
Explore further