Screener
DGS vs EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
Key differences
- EMMF costs 0.10% less per year.
- DGS is significantly larger than EMMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DGS follows a index tracking strategy; EMMF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EMMF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DGS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DGS | EMMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $167M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.31% | 2.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.41% | 16.07% |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -32.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DGS and EMMF
Explore further