Screener
DIME vs EZPZ
CoinShares Altcoins ETF vs Franklin Crypto Index ETF
Key differences
- DIME costs 0.19% less per year.
- EZPZ is significantly larger than DIME — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIME follows a active selection strategy; EZPZ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIME | EZPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $11M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 46.43% |
| Max drawdown | -70.25% | -52.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIME and EZPZ
Explore further