Screener
DIV vs SMDV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF vs ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, DIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIV | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $661M |
| Since | 2013 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 6.57% | 2.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.3% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.2% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.44 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.29% | 15.90% |
| Max drawdown | -52.74% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIV and SMDV
Explore further