Screener
DIVB vs DIVZ
iShares Core Dividend ETF vs Polen Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- DIVB costs 0.60% less per year.
- DIVB is significantly larger than DIVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVB follows a index tracking strategy; DIVZ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DIVB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVB | DIVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $242M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.34% | 2.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.0% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.0% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.30 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.34% | 9.19% |
| Max drawdown | -36.93% | -15.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVB and DIVZ
Explore further