Screener
DIVB vs PFM
iShares Core Dividend ETF vs Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- DIVB costs 0.47% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, DIVB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVB | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $764M |
| Since | 2017 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.34% | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.0% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.0% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.30 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.34% | 9.63% |
| Max drawdown | -36.93% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVB and PFM
Explore further