Screener
DIVG vs PFM
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF vs Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- DIVG costs 0.13% less per year.
- PFM is significantly larger than DIVG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVG | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $764M |
| Since | 2023 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 3.01% | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.81% | 9.63% |
| Max drawdown | -14.94% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVG and PFM
Explore further