Skip to content
Screener

DIVO vs CGHM

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF vs Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF

DIVO

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

Annual cost

0.56%

Fund size

$7.1B

CGHM

Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF

Annual cost

0.34%

Fund size

$3.1B

Key differences

DIVO is an alternative ETF, while CGHM is a fixed income ETF. DIVO charges 0.56% a year and CGHM 0.34%.

  • DIVO is an alternative fund, while CGHM is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • DIVO follows a option income strategy; CGHM uses index tracking.
  • CGHM costs 0.22% less per year.
  • DIVO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

DIVOCGHM
Annual cost (TER)0.56%0.34%
Fund size (AUM)$7.1B$3.1B
Since20162024
Dividend yield0.40%3.82%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+18.8%+9.0%
CAGR 3Y+15.8%N/A
CAGR 5Y+10.9%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.09N/A
Volatility 1Y9.20%3.11%
Max drawdown-30.04%-5.90%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to DIVO and CGHM