Screener
DIVO vs HCOW
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF vs Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- DIVO costs 0.09% less per year.
- DIVO is significantly larger than HCOW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVO | HCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.0B | $15M |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.07% | 11.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.9% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.10% | 14.11% |
| Max drawdown | -30.04% | -24.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVO and HCOW
Explore further