Skip to content
Screener

DIVO vs XUDV

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF vs Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF

DIVO

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

Annual cost

0.56%

Fund size

$7.1B

XUDV

Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF

Annual cost

0.09%

Fund size

$67M

Key differences

DIVO is an alternative ETF, while XUDV is an equity ETF. DIVO charges 0.56% a year and XUDV 0.09%.

  • DIVO is an alternative fund, while XUDV is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • DIVO follows a option income strategy; XUDV uses index tracking.
  • XUDV costs 0.47% less per year.
  • DIVO is much larger than XUDV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DIVO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

DIVOXUDV
Annual cost (TER)0.56%0.09%
Fund size (AUM)$7.1B$67M
Since20162025
Dividend yield1.60%3.42%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+18.5%+31.2%
CAGR 3Y+15.8%N/A
CAGR 5Y+10.7%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.09N/A
Volatility 1Y9.09%12.30%
Max drawdown-30.04%-15.99%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to DIVO and XUDV