Screener
DIVS vs EFAS
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF vs Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
Key differences
- DIVS costs 0.10% less per year.
- DIVS follows a active selection strategy; EFAS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVS | EFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $48M |
| Since | 2012 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.3% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.54% | 10.62% |
| Max drawdown | -29.55% | -44.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVS and EFAS
Explore further