Screener
DIVZ vs XUDV
Polen Dividend Income ETF vs Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF
Key differences
- XUDV costs 0.56% less per year.
- DIVZ is significantly larger than XUDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVZ follows a active selection strategy; XUDV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVZ | XUDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $64M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.57% | 3.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.19% | 12.27% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -15.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVZ and XUDV
Explore further