Screener
DLNV vs FMAY
FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF November vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
Key differences
- FMAY is significantly larger than DLNV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMAY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DLNV | FMAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.18% |
| Max drawdown | -4.83% | -13.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DLNV and FMAY
Explore further