Screener
DMXF vs ICLN
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- DMXF costs 0.27% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, DMXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DMXF | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $992M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2020 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.52% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.3% | +78.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.16% | 25.99% |
| Max drawdown | -34.52% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DMXF and ICLN
Explore further