Screener
DMXF vs SUSA
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF vs iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF
Key differences
- DMXF costs 0.13% less per year.
- SUSA is significantly larger than DMXF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DMXF covers global markets; SUSA covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, SUSA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SUSA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DMXF | SUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $992M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2020 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 4.52% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.3% | +26.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | +11.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.16% | 12.47% |
| Max drawdown | -34.52% | -32.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DMXF and SUSA
Explore further