Screener
DNL vs OUSA
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Growth Fund vs ALPS O'Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF Shares
Key differences
- DNL costs 0.06% less per year.
- DNL covers global markets; OUSA covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, OUSA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DNL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DNL | OUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $467M | $751M |
| Since | 2006 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.7% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.8% | +13.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.7% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.43 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.90% | 9.84% |
| Max drawdown | -34.85% | -33.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DNL and OUSA
Explore further