Screener
DNL vs QGRW
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Growth Fund vs Wisdomtree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
Key differences
- QGRW costs 0.14% less per year.
- QGRW is significantly larger than DNL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DNL covers global markets; QGRW covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, QGRW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DNL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DNL | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $467M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2006 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.0% | +35.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +30.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.41 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | 17.43% |
| Max drawdown | -34.85% | -24.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DNL and QGRW
Explore further