Screener
DOG vs DDM
ProShares Short Dow30 vs ProShares Ultra Dow30
Key differences
- DDM is significantly larger than DOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DOG follows a inverse strategy; DDM uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, DDM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DOG | DDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $111M | $530M |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 3.42% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -14.4% | +42.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -8.5% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.8% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.85 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.18% | 24.36% |
| Max drawdown | -70.40% | -63.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DOG and DDM
Explore further