Screener
DRAM vs CHAT
Roundhill Memory ETF vs Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
Key differences
- DRAM costs 0.10% less per year.
- DRAM is classified as alternative, while CHAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- DRAM follows a systematic alpha strategy; CHAT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| DRAM | CHAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2026 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.17% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +132.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +55.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 30.53% |
| Max drawdown | -10.46% | -31.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DRAM and CHAT
Explore further