Screener
DRGN vs THNQ
Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- DRGN costs 0.29% less per year.
- THNQ is significantly larger than DRGN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THNQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DRGN | THNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $322M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +68.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +38.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 25.96% |
| Max drawdown | -20.87% | -50.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DRGN and THNQ
Explore further