Screener
DRGN vs TMAT
Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Main Thematic Innovation ETF
Key differences
- DRGN costs 0.43% less per year.
- TMAT is significantly larger than DRGN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DRGN is classified as equity, while TMAT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- DRGN covers emerging markets markets; TMAT covers north america.
- DRGN follows a index tracking strategy; TMAT uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| DRGN | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.82% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $211M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.02% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +41.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 24.16% |
| Max drawdown | -20.87% | -58.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DRGN and TMAT
Explore further